The RubeTube

Life's a cube.  Solve it.


May 18, 2007
Two weeks after getting into the gym habit, I decided to take some measurements again. After all, I was feeling a bit lighter and healthier, and had some extra spring to my step, so I figured that meant that I'd lost a few pounds.

I measured my weight with the same machine used in our "Biggest Loser" contest, and I was elated to find my weight at a "mere" 196 pounds, even with my shoes on! You may think that this isn't such a big deal, but for me it was huge (or the opposite, actually, har har). For the longest time, I've always weighed in it over 200 pounds, and it's always been bothering me that I was that much overweight. Of course, 196 pounds is still overweight, but that 200-pound barrier was this hump that I've always wanted to get over... or under, rather. This is a great achievement for me, and it sure does a lot for me mentally as well. It gave me a huge psychological boost and it indicated that I was finally doing things right.

I've already accomplished what I wanted to achieve in our contest: to get into the habit of exercising and to start living a healthier lifestyle. Of course, actually winning the contest would be a very nice reward, so I'm definitely not slacking off!

And guess what? I've also lost an inch off my waistline! As a "consequence", I now have to tighten my belt by one notch.

To tell you the truth though, finding out I'd lost weight wasn't very surprising. I've somehow managed to maintain my weight in the 200 to 210-pound range with my regular eating habits; my weight was already very "stable". So if you just add a dash of exercise and combine that with lessened food intake, I was sure to lose some weight. All this simply proves the age old formula for weight-loss: Higher energy consumption + lower energy intake = lost pounds.

Labels: , , ,

3 Responses to “Under the 200-pound hump”

  1. # Blogger Patrick

    Developing your muscles will further catalyze your weight loss as muscles burn fats even at rest. The good thing if you have developed well your muscles, you don't have to starve yourself to lose weight. I do not mean to make a Johnny Bravo out of yourself, just lift enough weights and from time to time, increase tonnage and reduce repetitions. :)  

  2. # Blogger punzki

    @Patrick: Yup, exactly! That's all part of the strategy. ;)  

  3. # Blogger didith

    Good job, Punzki. A few years ago, I was so desperate to lose weight that I went to a dietician. Her point was yours exactly that activity should exceed consumption (you would think we should be able to figure that out on our own). I managed to lose 7 pounds and kept it off for more than a year. But then we ate our way through Japan--that ruined it completely.  

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

About me



Mark Punzalan
a.k.a. "Punzki"
Location: Redmond, WA
Occupation: Softie

Current tag-line:
I'm alive!
Now reading:
The Bible (really!)
Latest obsession:
NBA playoffs (via streaming)

Around the web:
punzki @ punzki.com
punzki @ Blogger
punzki @ del.icio.us
punzki @ LinkedIn
punzki @ Friendster
punzki @ Bloglines
punzki @ YouTube
punzki @ Multiply

Email me: punzki@gmail.com

Search

RSS feed



What is RSS?

AdSense


Et cetera




Locations of visitors to this page


Pinoy Top Blogs
Fantasy Sports Live!
Firefox 2

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates